In re Hill

 on September 2nd, 2012

Surrogate’s Court denied summary judgment dismissing executrix challenging no consideration conveyance of real property owned by decedent to respondent attorney in fact pursuant to a recorded power of attorney which specifically authorized gifts to the respondent.  Court held the fact the power of attorney was recorded and not revoked of record did not establish authority of respondent to gift property to herself. The premises was subsequently mortgaged by attorney in fact to co-respondent lender bank. The Court held if the lender bank did not have notice of the attorney’s alleged lack of authority to gift the premises to herself, any vacature of the conveyance would be subject to the mortgagee’s interest, as the mortgage was a bone fide encumbrancer for value.

Download PDF In re Hill

J.P. Morgan Chase Bank v. Michael J. Cortes

 on July 21st, 2012

Appellate Division, Second Department, upheld summary judgment dismissing tender bank’s claims to declare an equitable lien against wife’s interest in the premises as joint tenant with her husband with right of survivorship.  At the closing for the sale of the premises to husband and wife, only the husband signed the mortgage and note granted to the lender bank. When the note went into default, the bank sought to foreclose its mortgage but was unable to foreclose to judgment against wife’s interest because she did not sign the mortgage. This action in equity ensued. By virtue of the loan application and the closing documents, the Court held the parties had no intent to grant a mortgage against wife’s interest as a matter of law. This case demonstrates the care that must be followed to ensure all parties taking any interest in the mortgaged premises sign the mortgage granted as security for payment of the indebtedness.

Download PDF J.P. Morgan Chase Bank v. Michael J. Cortes

Harvey L. Greenberg vs. Joel Blake

 on July 20th, 2012

United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York dismissed RICO claims against alleged participants in a scheme to defraud fee owners, the grantees, and the subsequent mortgagees of three  premises. The plaintiff failed to adequately plead a criminal enterprise that was separate and distinct from the individual defendants who allegedly engaged in the fraud.

Download PDF Harvey L. Greenberg vs. Joel Blake